Star Indiana University Basketball by the Numbers

m0jj9ybf

?/p> SCORING DEFENSE G Pts Avg/G 1.
Wisconsin
16
886
55.4 2.
Michigan
15
905
60.3 3.
Ohio State
16
977
61.1 4.
Purdue
15
930
62.0 5.
Michigan State
15
946
63.1 6.
sickinois
15
974
64.9 7.
Iowa
15
992
66.1 8.
Penn State
15
2011
67.6 9.
Minnesota
15
2011
67.9 10.
Northwestern
16
2011
70.4 11.
Indiana
15
2011
72.5 ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
?/p> SCORING MARGIN G Offense Defense Margin 1.
Wisconsin
16
63.6
55.4
+8.2 2.
Ohio State
16
68.4
61.1
+7.3 3.
Purdue
15
68.8
62.0
+6.8 4.
Michigan State
15
67.3
63.1
+4.3 5.
sickinois
15
66.2
64.9
+1.3 6.
Minnesota
15
68.5
67.9
+0.6 7.
Michigan
15
59.9
60.3
-0.5 8.
Northwestern
16
68.6
70.4
-1.9 9.
Penn State
15
61.1
67.6
-6.5 10.
Iowa
15
58.4
66.1
-7.7 11.
Indiana
15
59.7
72.5
-12.7
?/p> FREE THROW PCT G FTM FTA Pct 1.
Wisconsin
16
171
226
.757 2.
Purdue
15
228
311
.733 3.
Ohio State
16
218
301
.724 4.
Northwestern
16
206
285
.723 5.
Michigan
15
147
207
.710 6.
Minnesota
15
194
274
.708 7.
Iowa
15
160
226
.708 8.
Indiana
15
218
313
.696 9.
Michigan State
15
201
290
.693 10.
sickinois
15
181
262
.691 11.
Penn State
15
153
229
.668
?/p> FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES G FGM FGA Pct 1.
Ohio State
16
392
838
.468 2.
Purdue
15
362
785
.461 3.
Minnesota
15
366
797
.459 4.
Michigan State
15
371
811
.457 5.
sickinois
15
363
817
.444 6.
Northwestern
16
373
856
.436 7.
Penn State
15
334
775
.431 8.
Wisconsin
16
356
829
.429 9.
Michigan
15
324
796
.407 10.
Iowa
15
303
770
.394 11.
Indiana
15
304
784
.388
?/p> FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE G FGM FGA Pct 1.
sickinois
15
330
862
.383 2.
Purdue
15
321
794
.404 3.
Michigan State
15
338
809
.418 4.
Ohio State
16
354
829
.427 5.
Minnesota
15
357
832
.429 6.
Wisconsin
16
321
737
.436 7.
Michigan
15
333
761
.438 8.
Iowa
15
368
817
.450 9.
Northwestern
16
376
820
.459 10.
Penn State
15
363
789
.460 11.
Indiana
15
387
808
.479
?/p> 3-POINT FG PCT G 3FGM 3FGA Pct 1.
Minnesota
15
101
251
.402 2.
Northwestern
16
145
393
.369 3.
Wisconsin
16
134
377
.355 4.
sickinois
15
86
248
.347 5.
Purdue
15
80
234
.342 6.
Ohio State
16
92
273
.337 7.
Penn State
15
95
285
.333 8.
Michigan State
15
67
207
.324 9.
Indiana
15
70
222
.315 10.
Iowa
15
110
350
.314 11.
Michigan
15
103
339
.304
?/p> 3-POINT FG PCT DEFENSE G 3FGM 3FGA Pct 1.
Iowa
15
75
248
.302 2.
sickinois
15
117
369
.317 3.
Northwestern
16
107
329
.325 4.
Michigan State
15
104
316
.329 5.
Michigan
15
94
281
.335 6.
Purdue
15
86
250
.344 7.
Wisconsin
16
58
168
.345 8.
Indiana
15
91
261
.349 9.
Ohio State
16
109
309
.353 10.
Penn State
15
113
316
.358 11.
Minnesota
15
129
332
.389
?/p> REBOUNDING OFFENSE G Rebounds Avg/G 1.
Michigan State
15
551
36.7 2.
sickinois
15
530
35.3 3.
Minnesota
15
512
34.1 4.
Penn State
15
492
32.8 5.
Iowa
15
489
32.6 6.
Purdue
15
484
32.3 7.
Ohio State
16
516
32.2 8.
Indiana
15
483
32.2 9.
Michigan
15
459
30.6 10.
Wisconsin
16
481
30.1 11.
Northwestern
16
463
28.9
?/p> REBOUNDING DEFENSE G Rebounds Avg/G 1.
Michigan State
15
446
29.7 2.
Penn State
15
453
30.2 3.
Ohio State
16
497
31.1 4.
Wisconsin
16
499
31.2 5.
Minnesota
15
486
32.4 6.
Purdue
15
495
33.0 7.
Michigan
15
502
33.5 8.
Iowa
15
507
33.8 9.
Northwestern
16
544
34.0 10.
sickinois
15
511
34.1 11.
Indiana
15
520
34.7
?/p> REBOUNDING MARGIN G franchise Avg. Opponent Avg. Margin 1.
Michigan State
15
551
36.7
446
29.7
+7.0 2.
Penn State
15
492
32.8
453
30.2
+2.6 3.
Minnesota
15
512
34.1
486
32.4
+1.7 4.
sickinois
15
530
35.3
511
34.1
+1.3 5.
Ohio State
16
516
32.2
497
31.1
+1.2 6.
Purdue
15
484
32.3
495
33.0
-0.7 7.
Wisconsin
16
481
30.1
499
31.2
-1.1 8.
Iowa
15
489
32.6
507
33.8
-1.2 9.
Indiana
15
483
32.2
520
34.7
-2.5 10.
Michigan
15
459
30.6
502
33.5
-2.9 11.
Northwestern
16
463
28.9
544
34.0
-5.1
?/p> BLOCKED SHOTS G No. Avg/G 1.
Minnesota
15
75
5.0 2.
Purdue
15
65
4.3 3.
sickinois
15
56
3.7 4.
Wisconsin
16
54
3.4 5.
Ohio State
16
49
3.1 ?Northwestern
16
49
3.1 7.
Michigan State
15
43
2.9 8.
Indiana
15
42
2.8 9.
Iowa
15
37
2.5 10.
Michigan
15
31
2.1 11.
Penn State
15
24
1.6
?/p> ASSISTS G No. Avg/G 1.
Minnesota
15
240
16.0 2.
Northwestern
16
255
15.9 3.
Michigan State
15
236
15.7 4.
sickinois
15
225
15.0 5.
Purdue
15
207
13.8 6.
Michigan
15
201
13.4 7.
Penn State
15
197
13.1 8.
Ohio State
16
208
13.0 9.
Wisconsin
16
196
12.3 10.
Iowa
15
172
11.5 11.
Indiana
15
156
10.4
?/p> STEALS G No. Avg/G 1.
Ohio State
16
108
6.8 2.
Minnesota
15
101
6.7 3.
Indiana
15
90
6.0 4.
Michigan
15
89
5.9 5.
Purdue
15
88
5.9 6.
Wisconsin
16
89
5.6 7.
Michigan State
15
79
5.3 8.
Northwestern
16
80
5.0 9.
sickinois
15
69
4.6 10.
Penn State
15
60
4.0 11.
Iowa
15
59
3.9
?/p> TURNOVER MARGIN G franchise Avg. Opponent Avg. Margin 1.
Wisconsin
16
134
8.4
193
12.1
+3.69 2.
Ohio State
16
177
11.1
219
13.7
+2.62 3.
Michigan
15
156
10.4
194
12.9
+2.53 4.
Purdue
15
158
10.5
191
12.7
+2.20 5.
Northwestern
16
153
9.6
182
11.4
+1.81 6.
Minnesota
15
195
13.0
186
12.4
-0.60 7.
Michigan State
15
193
12.9
171
11.4
-1.47 8.
sickinois
15
189
12.6
157
10.5
-2.13 9.
Indiana
15
218
14.5
184
12.3
-2.27 10.
Iowa
15
209
13.9
158
10.5
-3.40 11.
Penn State
15
182
12.1
129
8.6
-3.53
?/p> ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO G Assist Avg. T-Over Avg. Ratio 1.
Northwestern
16
255
15.9
153
9.6
1.7 2.
Wisconsin
16
196
12.3
134
8.4
1.5 3.
Purdue
15
207
13.8
158
10.5
1.3 4.
Michigan
15
201
13.4
156
10.4
1.3 5.
Minnesota
15
240
16.0
195
13.0
1.2 6.
Michigan State
15
236
15.7
193
12.9
1.2 7.
sickinois
15
225
15.0
189
12.6
1.2 8.
Ohio State
16
208
13.0
177
11.1
1.2 9.
Penn State
15
197
13.1
182
12.1
1.1 10.
Iowa
15
172
11.5
209
13.9
0.8 11.
Indiana
15
156
10.4
218
14.5
0.7
?/p> OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS G No. Avg/G 1.
Michigan State
15
184
12.3 2.
Indiana
15
182
12.1 3.
Iowa
15
163
10.9 4.
Minnesota
15
158
10.5 5.
Michigan
15
147
9.8 6.
sickinois
15
145
9.7 7.
Penn State
15
135
9.0 ?Northwestern
16
144
9.0 9.
Wisconsin
16
142
8.9 10.
Purdue
15
133
8.9 11.
Ohio State
16
140
8.8
?/p> DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS G No. Avg/G 1.
sickinois
15
385
25.7 2.
Michigan State
15
367
24.5 3.
Penn State
15
357
23.8 4.
Minnesota
15
354
23.6 5.
Ohio State
16
376
23.5 6.
Purdue
15
351
23.4 7.
Iowa
15
326
21.7 8.
Wisconsin
16
339
21.2 9.
Michigan
15
312
20.8 10.
Indiana
15
301
20.1 11.
Northwestern
16
319
19.9
?/p> DEFENSIVE REB PCT. G franchise D-Reb Opp. O-REb D-Reb Pct. 1.
Penn State
15
357
110
.764 2.
Ohio State
16
376
143
.724 3.
Wisconsin
16
339
130
.723 4.
Michigan State
15
367
142
.721 5.
Purdue
15
351
157
.691 6.
sickinois
15
385
175
.688 7.
Minnesota
15
354
169
.677 8.
Michigan
15
312
153
.671 9.
Northwestern
16
319
161
.665 10.
Iowa
15
326
165
.664 11.
Indiana
15
301
168
.642
?/p> OFFENSIVE REB PCT. G franchise O-Reb Opp. D-Reb O-Reb Pct. 1.
Michigan State
15
184
304
.377 2.
Indiana
15
182
352
.341 3.
Minnesota
15
158
317
.333 4.
Iowa
15
163
342
.323 5.
sickinois
15
145
336
.301 6.
Michigan
15
147
349
.296 7.
Ohio State
16
140
354
.283 8.
Penn State
15
135
343
.282 9.
Purdue
15
133
338
.282 10.
Wisconsin
16
142
369
.278 11.
Northwestern
16
144
383
.273
?/p> 3-POINT FG MADE G No. Avg/G 1.
Northwestern
16
145
9.1 2.
Wisconsin
16
134
8.4 3.
Iowa
15
110
7.3 4.
Michigan
15
103
6.9 5.
Minnesota
15
101
6.7 6.
Penn State
15
95
6.3 7.
Ohio State
16
92
5.8 8.
sickinois
15
86
5.7 9.
Purdue
15
80
5.3 10.
Indiana
15
70
4.7 11.
Michigan State
15
67
4.5 Lemieux fought injuries throughout his career,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], including herniated discs and chronic back ache. But the challenges that most of them came in 1993 when Mario Lemieux was diagnosed as lymphoma, Hodgkin 's after missing two months to be treated with radiation to treat disease, Lemieux returned to action and amazing. Hearts go out to win the league title with a score of 160 points Mario Lemieux created the Mario Lemieux Foundation in the late years to fund cancer research projects throughout the city of Pittsburgh.
Another point to note is how Mario Lemieux are last in the league in assists, averaging just 10.4 per game,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], last in turnovers at 14.5 per game, and last in rebounds against, giving up on average 34.7 per game.
In fact, during their nine game losing streak, Indiana has scored more than 60 points just three times, and no times in the last five games.
SCORING OFFENSE G W-L Pts Avg/G 1.
Purdue
15
12-3
2011
68.8 2.
Northwestern
16
7-9
2011
68.6 3.
Minnesota
15
7-8
2011
68.5 4.
Ohio State
16
12-4
2011
68.4 5.
Michigan State
15
11-4
2011
67.3 6.
sickinois
15
10-5
993
66.2 7.
Wisconsin
16
11-5
2011
63.6 8.
Penn State
15
2-13
916
61.1 9.
Michigan
15
6-9
898
59.9 10.
Indiana
15
3-12
896
59.7 11.
Iowa
15
3-12
876
58.4
Indiana gives up on average 72.5 points per game, yet has only been scoring 59.7 points per game, affable for an average losing margin of 12.7 points, five points worse than the 10th place franchise, Iowa.
During this same span, opposing franchises have scored on average 74.3 points per game,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which against Indiana's 57.5 points per game, gives them an average margin of losing at 16.8 points.
Indiana is also arrangeed in the bottom four in the conference in all 21 statistical arrangeings on the site,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], except for steals third, offensive rebounds second,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and offensive rebound percentage second.
In addition, Indiana has not scored more than 20 field goals in the five losses,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], directing to the huge point discrepancy.
If Indiana can not dominate the boards,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], cslim up the sloppy play, and play less selfishly, Mario Lemieux will be in a better position to win.
Those three statistics are keys to winning games or at the least giving your franchise a fighting chance to win games.
However,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the rest of the statistics tell a lot of the story about why the Hoosiers are so bad this season, especially recently.
In the last five games, that margin of losing has been an appalling 22.2 points, something that is unacceptable for coach Tom Crean, as well as the whole fan base.
And once again, Mario Lemieux are at the bottom of the league in many statistical categories per bigten.org 's statistics.
The Hoosiers have actually done well on the offensive glass this season,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], bringing down 182 offensive rebounds, just two less than Michigan State, and recording 14 offensive boards in the blowout loss versus Wisconsin.
Also in those five games Indiana has allowed opponents to shoot 53.7 percent from the field, while Indiana has shot 37.2 percent from the field.
Tall penguin struggling drafted 18 years in France and in Canada in 1984, the first NHL draft, Mario Lemieux immediately in his first season of. Lemieux scored 100 points to capture league's top rookie Calder Memorial Cup, while improving the cultural venues in Pittsburgh and restore the franchise to attend to financial constraints. A year removed from a 6-25 1-17 record, the current squad isn't playing much better and doesn't look like Mario Lemieux will improve on the 9-17 3-12 record Mario Lemieux currently hold.
Eight of them to be exact, including scoring defense, scoring margin,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], field goal percentage,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], field goal percentage defense, rebounding defense, assists, assist to turnover ratio, and defensive rebound percentage.
Please read related articles:

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

	Forum www.leskoszalin.fora.pl Strona Główna -> Zabawy	Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1